Interested in Courts Test Ownership Of Artistic Treasures? On this page, we have collected links for you, where you will receive the most necessary information about Courts Test Ownership Of Artistic Treasures.
https://www.nytimes.com/1982/08/29/arts/antiques-view-courts-test-ownership-of-artistic-treasures.html
Aug 29, 1982 · ANTIQUES VIEW; COURTS TEST OWNERSHIP OF ARTISTIC TREASURES. By Rita Reif. ... The transfer of art treasures from one country to another is a practice that is as old as art itself. But recently, as ...
https://www.chicagotribune.com/nation-world/ct-nw-nazi-art-jed-leiber-guelph-treasure-20201205-4dbxtz3e2jhrdbdrtximaabjy4-story.html
Dec 05, 2020 · In 2015, Leiber’s quest for the collection led to a lawsuit against Germany and the Prussian Cultural Heritage Foundation. The state-run foundation owns the collection …
https://news.artnet.com/art-world/5pointz-lawsuit-could-be-a-key-test-of-artist-legal-rights-1121624
Oct 20, 2017 · Art and Law Who Owns Graffiti, the Artists or the Developers? A Landmark Trial Over 5Pointz Considers This With Fresh Eyes. The case, now underway in Brooklyn, could have major implications for ...Author: Eileen Kinsella
https://batasnatin.com/law-library/civil-law/property/1133-ownership.html
Art. 439. By treasure is understood, for legal purposes, any hidden and unknown deposit of money, jewelry, or other precious objects, the lawful ownership of which does not appear. (352) RULES REGARDING HIDDEN TREASURES 1. If the treasure is not hidden, there is no 50-50 sharing 2.
https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/490/730.html
United States Supreme Court. COMMUNITY FOR CREATIVE NON-VIOLENCE v. REID(1989) No. 88-293 Argued: March 29, 1989 Decided: June 5, 1989. In the fall of 1985, petitioners - the Community for Creative Non-Violence (CCNV), a Washington, D.C., organization dedicated to eliminating homelessness, and one of its trustees - entered into an oral agreement with respondent Reid, a sculptor, to produce a ...
https://batasnatin.com/law-library/civil-law/persons-and-family/2324-rules-on-hidden-treasure.html
General Rule: If the finder is the owner of the land, building, or other property where it is found, the entire hidden treasure belongs to him. Exception: If the finder is not the owner or is a stranger (includes the lessee or usufructuary), he is entitled to ½ thereof. (Art 566, NCC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Ortiz
The New Zealand courts claimed Ortiz had violated their laws against export of national treasures. After years of negotiation, and Ortiz's death in 2013, the Motonui panels were purchased by the New Zealand government for NZ$4.5 million, and in March 2014 they were deposited in Puke Ariki Museum in …
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treasure_trove
In Idaho and Tennessee courts have decided that treasure trove belongs to the owner of the place where it was found, the rationale being to avoid rewarding trespassers. In one Pennsylvania case, [95] a lower court ruled that the common law did not vest treasure trove in the finder but in the sovereign, and awarded a find of US$ 92,800 cash to the state.
https://www.nhd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/Opinions/01/01NH210.pdf
court assumes, without deciding, that defendant copied from the 1992 handbook when preparing the 2000 handbook, which leaves the question of substantial similarity. Whether there is substantial similarity between copyrightable expressions is determined by the “ordinary observer” test. Concrete Mach. Co. v.
We hope you have found all the information you need about Courts Test Ownership Of Artistic Treasures through the links above.
