Interested in Fortnightly Corp V United Artists Television? On this page, we have collected links for you, where you will receive the most necessary information about Fortnightly Corp V United Artists Television.
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/392/390/
Fortnightly Corp. v. United Artists Television, Inc., 392 U.S. 390 (1968) Fortnightly Corp. v. United Artists Television, Inc. No. 618. Argued March 13, 1968. Decided June 17, 1968. 392 U.S. 390. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT Syllabus
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/392/390
The petitioner, Fortnightly Corporation, owns and operates community antenna television (CATV) systems in Clarksburg and Fairmont, West Virginia.1 There were no local television broadcasting stations in that immediate area until 1957. Now there are two, but, because of hilly terrain, most residents of the area cannot receive the broadcasts of any additional stations by ordinary rooftop antennas.
https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/392/390.html
FORTNIGHTLY CORP. v. UNITED ARTISTS(1968) No. 618 Argued: March 13, 1968 Decided: June 17, 1968. Petitioner operates community antenna television (CATV) systems which receive, amplify, and modulate signals from five television stations, convert them to different frequencies, and transmit them to their subscribers' television sets.
https://lawaspect.com/case-fortnightly-corporation-v-united-artists-television-inc/
PETITIONER:Fortnightly Corporation RESPONDENT:United Artists Television, Inc. LOCATION:WAFB TV. DOCKET NO.: 618 DECIDED BY: Warren Court (1967-1969) LOWER COURT: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. CITATION: 392 US …
https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Fortnightly_Corporation_v._United_Artists_Television,_Inc./Opinion_of_the_Court
The petitioner, Fortnightly Corporation, owns and operates community antenna television (CATV) systems in Clarksburg and Fairmont, West Virginia. There were no local television broadcasting stations in that immediate area until 1957. Now there are two, but, because of hilly terrain, most residents of the area cannot receive the broadcasts of any additional stations by ordinary rooftop antennas.
https://www.oyez.org/cases/1967/618
"Fortnightly Corporation v. United Artists Television, Inc." Oyez, www.oyez.org/cases/1967/618. Accessed 25 Jan. 2021.
https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/255/177/1818122/
United Artists Television, Inc. v. Fortnightly Corporation, 255 F. Supp. 177 (S.D.N.Y. 1966) US District Court for the Southern District of New York - 255 F. Supp. 177 (S.D.N.Y. 1966) May 23, 1966. 255 F. Supp. 177 (1966) UNITED ARTISTS TELEVISION, INC., Plaintiff,
We hope you have found all the information you need about Fortnightly Corp V United Artists Television through the links above.
